<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1011 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326897</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to treat the entire business as speculative for setting off losses and deleted the disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal emphasized treating the business as a composite entity and ruled that disallowance under Section 14A is only applicable when actual expenditure is incurred for earning exempt income. The ground regarding the apportionment of expenses was dismissed as it was not pressed during the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 19:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1011 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326897</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to treat the entire business as speculative for setting off losses and deleted the disallowance under Section 14A. The Tribunal emphasized treating the business as a composite entity and ruled that disallowance under Section 14A is only applicable when actual expenditure is incurred for earning exempt income. The ground regarding the apportionment of expenses was dismissed as it was not pressed during the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>