<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1005 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326891</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the SC found no reason to entertain the special leave petition and dismissed it. The operative result was that the challenge did not proceed further on admission, leaving the lower-court position undisturbed. No substantive legal issue was decided in the order beyond refusal to grant leave.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1005 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326891</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the SC found no reason to entertain the special leave petition and dismissed it. The operative result was that the challenge did not proceed further on admission, leaving the lower-court position undisturbed. No substantive legal issue was decided in the order beyond refusal to grant leave.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>