<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1000 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326886</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order jurisdiction, rejected the disallowance of Rs. 28.00 lakh under section 40A(3) due to business expediency in advance cash payments, and deleted the adhoc disallowance of Rs. 38,88,175/- out of labour charges at the rate of 10% based on the presented evidence. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1000 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326886</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order jurisdiction, rejected the disallowance of Rs. 28.00 lakh under section 40A(3) due to business expediency in advance cash payments, and deleted the adhoc disallowance of Rs. 38,88,175/- out of labour charges at the rate of 10% based on the presented evidence. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>