<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 988 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s conduct was bona fide, with no intention to evade taxes. Errors in the return were attributed to the negligence of the online tax filing portal. The Tribunal held that the explanations provided for discrepancies were plausible and bona fide. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed unwarranted, and the penalty imposed by the AO was deleted. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was removed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2016 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 988 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s conduct was bona fide, with no intention to evade taxes. Errors in the return were attributed to the negligence of the online tax filing portal. The Tribunal held that the explanations provided for discrepancies were plausible and bona fide. The penalty under Section 271(1)(c) was deemed unwarranted, and the penalty imposed by the AO was deleted. The appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was removed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>