https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181894 The High Court held that under Section 60(b) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act 2008, revision against seizure orders of goods is prohibited. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on challenging seizure orders through writ petitions necessitated a Larger Bench for a definitive ruling. The case emphasizes the importance of statutory provisions in contesting seizure orders and the necessity for a clear understanding of the revision scope before the High Court in similar cases. en-us Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 Apr 2016 10:24:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181894 The High Court held that under Section 60(b) of the U.P. Value Added Tax Act 2008, revision against seizure orders of goods is prohibited. Conflicting Division Bench decisions on challenging seizure orders through writ petitions necessitated a Larger Bench for a definitive ruling. The case emphasizes the importance of statutory provisions in contesting seizure orders and the necessity for a clear understanding of the revision scope before the High Court in similar cases. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181894