<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 428 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181893</link>
    <description>The appellants failed to establish themselves as borrowers or prove that the transaction in question constituted a loan under the Bengal Money Lenders Act. Consequently, they were denied relief under Section 30 of the Act, which limits the amount borrowers can be required to repay. The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the respondent and ordering the appellants to bear the costs of the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 428 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181893</link>
      <description>The appellants failed to establish themselves as borrowers or prove that the transaction in question constituted a loan under the Bengal Money Lenders Act. Consequently, they were denied relief under Section 30 of the Act, which limits the amount borrowers can be required to repay. The Court dismissed the appeal, ruling in favor of the respondent and ordering the appellants to bear the costs of the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>