<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 984 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326870</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal based on the factual and evidentiary considerations presented during the proceedings. The core issues of service tax liability on interest received on discounting of bills and depository charges were resolved in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of the Chartered Accountant&#039;s analysis in determining tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2016 10:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 984 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326870</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal based on the factual and evidentiary considerations presented during the proceedings. The core issues of service tax liability on interest received on discounting of bills and depository charges were resolved in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the importance of the Chartered Accountant&#039;s analysis in determining tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>