https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326860 The court upheld the decision to grant preference to the fourth respondent under Rule 5(1)(a) of the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002, dismissing the appeal and affirming the learned Single Judge's ruling. The appellant's challenge to the cancellation of provisional allotment of toddy shops and contentions regarding the registration of a crime against the fourth respondent were not accepted, with the court finding no basis to interfere with the judgment and orders in favor of the fourth respondent. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:57:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326860 The court upheld the decision to grant preference to the fourth respondent under Rule 5(1)(a) of the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002, dismissing the appeal and affirming the learned Single Judge's ruling. The appellant's challenge to the cancellation of provisional allotment of toddy shops and contentions regarding the registration of a crime against the fourth respondent were not accepted, with the court finding no basis to interfere with the judgment and orders in favor of the fourth respondent. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 09 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326860