<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 970 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside a penalty of Rs. 8,50,000 imposed on the appellant under Sections 112(a) and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The case involved M/s. Western Impex as the actual importer of Measuring Tapes from Singapore, absolving the appellant of liability for abetting mis-declaration of value. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s actions did not warrant penalties as the importer had accepted orders, paid dues, and cleared goods independently. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s involvement insufficient to render the goods confiscatable, leading to the penalty being overturned and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 970 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside a penalty of Rs. 8,50,000 imposed on the appellant under Sections 112(a) and 114 AA of the Customs Act, 1962. The case involved M/s. Western Impex as the actual importer of Measuring Tapes from Singapore, absolving the appellant of liability for abetting mis-declaration of value. The Tribunal held that the appellant&#039;s actions did not warrant penalties as the importer had accepted orders, paid dues, and cleared goods independently. Relying on precedent, the Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s involvement insufficient to render the goods confiscatable, leading to the penalty being overturned and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>