<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 968 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326854</link>
    <description>Input tax credit under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act was denied for duty paid on purchase of DEPB licences because, although the licences were treated as goods, they were not goods specified in the First Schedule and did not satisfy the statutory credit conditions in Section 19(1). The scheme of Section 19 was treated as a complete code for entitlement, denial, reversal, transfer and carry forward of credit. On that basis, the listed purposes in Section 19(2) were held to be enumerative rather than exhaustive, but that construction did not assist the assessee because the statutory requirements for credit on DEPB licences were not met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 14:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 968 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326854</link>
      <description>Input tax credit under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act was denied for duty paid on purchase of DEPB licences because, although the licences were treated as goods, they were not goods specified in the First Schedule and did not satisfy the statutory credit conditions in Section 19(1). The scheme of Section 19 was treated as a complete code for entitlement, denial, reversal, transfer and carry forward of credit. On that basis, the listed purposes in Section 19(2) were held to be enumerative rather than exhaustive, but that construction did not assist the assessee because the statutory requirements for credit on DEPB licences were not met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>