https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326850 The court held that a writ petition is not maintainable against an order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act when an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 is available, except in exceptional circumstances. The Chief Justice's prerogative in constituting Benches was upheld, and the statutory requirement of pre-deposit under Section 18 was deemed mandatory. The court found the decision in *Hotel Vandana Palace* to be per incuriam and remitted the matter to the Single Judge for further consideration. en-us Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326850 The court held that a writ petition is not maintainable against an order of the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act when an alternative remedy of appeal under Section 18 is available, except in exceptional circumstances. The Chief Justice's prerogative in constituting Benches was upheld, and the statutory requirement of pre-deposit under Section 18 was deemed mandatory. The court found the decision in *Hotel Vandana Palace* to be per incuriam and remitted the matter to the Single Judge for further consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326850