https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181873 A civilian Defence employee paid from Defence estimates was held outside Article 311(2) protection, so the constitutional safeguard against dismissal, removal or reduction in rank after inquiry was unavailable. The Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, being subordinate to Articles 309, 310 and 311, could not independently confer protection where Article 311(2) did not apply. Although the appellants succeeded on these legal questions, the existing decree was left undisturbed on equitable grounds because the respondent had litigated as an indigent person, faced long delay, and proceeded when the law was unsettled. en-us Thu, 15 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:06:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181873 A civilian Defence employee paid from Defence estimates was held outside Article 311(2) protection, so the constitutional safeguard against dismissal, removal or reduction in rank after inquiry was unavailable. The Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, being subordinate to Articles 309, 310 and 311, could not independently confer protection where Article 311(2) did not apply. Although the appellants succeeded on these legal questions, the existing decree was left undisturbed on equitable grounds because the respondent had litigated as an indigent person, faced long delay, and proceeded when the law was unsettled. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Dec 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181873