https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181872 Preventive detention under the Act requires a real nexus between the grounds invoked and the statutory purpose of protecting supplies and services essential to the community. A mere licensing breach, such as unauthorised storage of light diesel oil, was treated as insufficient because it did not show diversion, disruption, or prejudice to essential supplies. The detention order was also vitiated where affidavits gave contradictory accounts of which authority passed it and who formed the requisite satisfaction. In those circumstances, the Court held that the order lacked clarity and lawful subjective satisfaction, and the detention could not be sustained. en-us Tue, 15 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Apr 2016 17:06:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181872 Preventive detention under the Act requires a real nexus between the grounds invoked and the statutory purpose of protecting supplies and services essential to the community. A mere licensing breach, such as unauthorised storage of light diesel oil, was treated as insufficient because it did not show diversion, disruption, or prejudice to essential supplies. The detention order was also vitiated where affidavits gave contradictory accounts of which authority passed it and who formed the requisite satisfaction. In those circumstances, the Court held that the order lacked clarity and lawful subjective satisfaction, and the detention could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Jul 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181872