<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1936 (2) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181860</link>
    <description>In a statutory reference under section 66(2), only the question of law specifically raised in the original application can be required to be referred. A party cannot enlarge the scope of the reference by introducing a new question later, even if it is framed as arising from the same order or an assumed succession issue. The reference jurisdiction is confined to questions properly included in the application, and a subsequently added issue is treated as outside that jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:30:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1936 (2) TMI 21 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181860</link>
      <description>In a statutory reference under section 66(2), only the question of law specifically raised in the original application can be required to be referred. A party cannot enlarge the scope of the reference by introducing a new question later, even if it is framed as arising from the same order or an assumed succession issue. The reference jurisdiction is confined to questions properly included in the application, and a subsequently added issue is treated as outside that jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 1936 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>