<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 80 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3200</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the requirement for a public sector bank to obtain approval from the Committee on Disputes (COD) before pursuing an appeal. Emphasizing the importance of COD clearance, the court set a deadline for the bank to seek approval within one month of filing the appeal. Additionally, the judgment highlighted the judicially evolved practice of utilizing Alternative Disputes Resolution (ADR) mechanisms to resolve disputes before litigation, as mandated by a Supreme Court order. Non-granting of clearance by the COD was deemed to result in dismissal of the appeal, underscoring the mandatory nature of seeking prior clearance for litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 80 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3200</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the requirement for a public sector bank to obtain approval from the Committee on Disputes (COD) before pursuing an appeal. Emphasizing the importance of COD clearance, the court set a deadline for the bank to seek approval within one month of filing the appeal. Additionally, the judgment highlighted the judicially evolved practice of utilizing Alternative Disputes Resolution (ADR) mechanisms to resolve disputes before litigation, as mandated by a Supreme Court order. Non-granting of clearance by the COD was deemed to result in dismissal of the appeal, underscoring the mandatory nature of seeking prior clearance for litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>