<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 147 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3192</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Court found no substantial question of law and ruled that the interest expenditure had already been accounted for in the Profit and Loss Account, hence no separate deduction was allowed. The case was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 147 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3192</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision. The Court found no substantial question of law and ruled that the interest expenditure had already been accounted for in the Profit and Loss Account, hence no separate deduction was allowed. The case was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>