<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 29 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3189</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that catering services provided in a factory do not qualify as input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules. Despite being mandatory under the Factories Act, catering services were deemed more of a welfare activity than a business-related one. The decision emphasized the distinction between business-related activities and welfare activities, stating that catering services do not directly contribute to the business of manufacture. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) finding and allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, establishing a precedent for similar cases involving the classification of services for credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 29 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3189</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that catering services provided in a factory do not qualify as input services under the CENVAT Credit Rules. Despite being mandatory under the Factories Act, catering services were deemed more of a welfare activity than a business-related one. The decision emphasized the distinction between business-related activities and welfare activities, stating that catering services do not directly contribute to the business of manufacture. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) finding and allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, establishing a precedent for similar cases involving the classification of services for credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>