<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 141 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3181</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and directed the Assessing Authority to reassess the matter, emphasizing the importance of considering evidence of TDS payment to prevent double taxation and financial hardship for the assessee. The Court highlighted that the delay in producing evidence was due to external factors and allowed the assessee to present further evidence for a fair resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 141 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3181</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and directed the Assessing Authority to reassess the matter, emphasizing the importance of considering evidence of TDS payment to prevent double taxation and financial hardship for the assessee. The Court highlighted that the delay in producing evidence was due to external factors and allowed the assessee to present further evidence for a fair resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>