<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 174 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3177</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the revenue, stating that as the interest income was not considered part of the business income, there was no basis for deducting 10% of it from the profits for calculating deductions under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized the significance of accurately categorizing income under different heads for precise computation of deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 174 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3177</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the revenue, stating that as the interest income was not considered part of the business income, there was no basis for deducting 10% of it from the profits for calculating deductions under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized the significance of accurately categorizing income under different heads for precise computation of deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>