<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (5) TMI 934 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181845</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The High Court was directed to treat the election petition as an original proceeding, allowing the parties to produce evidence and examining the veracity of the rival claims. The High Court was instructed to complete the trial within six months, if necessary, by holding day-to-day hearings. The appeal was allowed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2023 13:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (5) TMI 934 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181845</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and remitted the matter for fresh consideration. The High Court was directed to treat the election petition as an original proceeding, allowing the parties to produce evidence and examining the veracity of the rival claims. The High Court was instructed to complete the trial within six months, if necessary, by holding day-to-day hearings. The appeal was allowed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>