<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 958 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326844</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the disallowance of interest paid to the bank on a cash credit account and penal interest was not justified. It concluded there was no nexus between the borrowed funds and investments/loans and recognized the compensatory nature of the penal interest. The tribunal referenced relevant case law and held in favor of the appellant, emphasizing business purposes and lack of justification for disallowance under the specified sections of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:28:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 958 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326844</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the disallowance of interest paid to the bank on a cash credit account and penal interest was not justified. It concluded there was no nexus between the borrowed funds and investments/loans and recognized the compensatory nature of the penal interest. The tribunal referenced relevant case law and held in favor of the appellant, emphasizing business purposes and lack of justification for disallowance under the specified sections of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>