<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 950 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326836</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty of Rs. 23,77,742/- imposed by the AO on the assessee. The penalty was annulled due to the invalidity of the notice, which failed to clearly specify the grounds for penalty as required by law. The Tribunal did not delve into the substantive merits of the case but ruled in favor of the assessee based on the technical deficiency in the penalty notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:27:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 950 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326836</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty of Rs. 23,77,742/- imposed by the AO on the assessee. The penalty was annulled due to the invalidity of the notice, which failed to clearly specify the grounds for penalty as required by law. The Tribunal did not delve into the substantive merits of the case but ruled in favor of the assessee based on the technical deficiency in the penalty notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>