<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 943 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326829</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, affirming the disallowance of advertisement expenses, consultancy expenses, commission, and cash expenditure while allowing the payment to the related party for legal consultancy. The judgment emphasized the necessity for the assessee to substantiate claims with adequate evidence and adhere to statutory provisions for expense deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 943 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326829</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, affirming the disallowance of advertisement expenses, consultancy expenses, commission, and cash expenditure while allowing the payment to the related party for legal consultancy. The judgment emphasized the necessity for the assessee to substantiate claims with adequate evidence and adhere to statutory provisions for expense deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>