<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 171 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3169</link>
    <description>The court allowed depreciation claimed on machinery not used during the assessment year, ruling in favor of the assessee. Sales Tax and Central Sales Tax were excluded from total turnover for deduction under Section 80HHC, following precedent in favor of the assessee. However, interest income from FDRs was not considered part of business income for deduction under Section 80HHC, with the court ruling in favor of the revenue in this instance. The court&#039;s judgment favored the assessee in the first two issues and the revenue in the third issue, based on legal precedents and statutory interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 171 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3169</link>
      <description>The court allowed depreciation claimed on machinery not used during the assessment year, ruling in favor of the assessee. Sales Tax and Central Sales Tax were excluded from total turnover for deduction under Section 80HHC, following precedent in favor of the assessee. However, interest income from FDRs was not considered part of business income for deduction under Section 80HHC, with the court ruling in favor of the revenue in this instance. The court&#039;s judgment favored the assessee in the first two issues and the revenue in the third issue, based on legal precedents and statutory interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>