<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 941 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326827</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s contention that the agriculture land within the municipal limits of Amritsar, classified as agricultural land in the revenue record and used for agricultural purposes, was exempt from wealth tax under the proviso to Section 2(ea)(b) of the Wealth-tax Act. The order of the learned CIT(A) was sustained, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on 22.04.2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:25:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 941 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326827</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s contention that the agriculture land within the municipal limits of Amritsar, classified as agricultural land in the revenue record and used for agricultural purposes, was exempt from wealth tax under the proviso to Section 2(ea)(b) of the Wealth-tax Act. The order of the learned CIT(A) was sustained, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed on 22.04.2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>