https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326820 The Court allowed the petitioner's challenge against the order dismissing their appeal for not paying the statutory pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court directed the Commissioner to re-examine the inclusion of freight charges in the service tax calculation, acknowledging the petitioner's claim. The Commissioner was instructed to issue a fresh order within six weeks. If the revised assessment exceeded Rs. 20 crore, the petitioner had to pay Rs. 50,000 in costs; otherwise, costs would be waived. The Court's decision aimed to ensure a fair evaluation of the petitioner's tax liability and uphold legal requirements in tax matters. en-us Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:23:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326820 The Court allowed the petitioner's challenge against the order dismissing their appeal for not paying the statutory pre-deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court directed the Commissioner to re-examine the inclusion of freight charges in the service tax calculation, acknowledging the petitioner's claim. The Commissioner was instructed to issue a fresh order within six weeks. If the revised assessment exceeded Rs. 20 crore, the petitioner had to pay Rs. 50,000 in costs; otherwise, costs would be waived. The Court's decision aimed to ensure a fair evaluation of the petitioner's tax liability and uphold legal requirements in tax matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326820