<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 924 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326810</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the conditions for the provisional release of seized aircrafts under section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962. It reduced the bank guarantee requirement from full duty liability to 20% while maintaining the bond for the full value of the aircrafts. The decision considered the unresolved duty liability issues and the appellants&#039; reliance on notifications for exemption and concession, providing a balanced resolution to the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 10:01:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 924 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326810</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the conditions for the provisional release of seized aircrafts under section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962. It reduced the bank guarantee requirement from full duty liability to 20% while maintaining the bond for the full value of the aircrafts. The decision considered the unresolved duty liability issues and the appellants&#039; reliance on notifications for exemption and concession, providing a balanced resolution to the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326810</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>