<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 187 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3164</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal due to a 12-day delay under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the appellant had valid reasons for the delay, caused by a strike at the State Bank of India. The Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider these reasons and its hyper-technical approach were deemed unjust. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for a fresh hearing on the merits, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=42516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 187 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3164</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision to dismiss the appeal due to a 12-day delay under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court found that the appellant had valid reasons for the delay, caused by a strike at the State Bank of India. The Tribunal&#039;s failure to consider these reasons and its hyper-technical approach were deemed unjust. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for a fresh hearing on the merits, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=3164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>