https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181823 The Supreme Court held that the respondent's dismissal by the Uttar Pradesh State Warehousing Corporation violated principles of natural justice as he was not given a fair opportunity to defend himself. The Court affirmed the respondent's locus standi to maintain the writ petition as an employee of a statutory body. However, the Court found that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by directing reinstatement with full back wages, stating that such determinations should be made by industrial tribunals or labor courts. The dismissal was upheld, but the direction for full back wages was deleted, with the Corporation ordered to pay the respondent's costs. en-us Wed, 16 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:58:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181823 The Supreme Court held that the respondent's dismissal by the Uttar Pradesh State Warehousing Corporation violated principles of natural justice as he was not given a fair opportunity to defend himself. The Court affirmed the respondent's locus standi to maintain the writ petition as an employee of a statutory body. However, the Court found that the High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by directing reinstatement with full back wages, stating that such determinations should be made by industrial tribunals or labor courts. The dismissal was upheld, but the direction for full back wages was deleted, with the Corporation ordered to pay the respondent's costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181823