<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 655 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181806</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling that buyback of lease equipment and leasing to boards were genuine transactions, not aimed at tax evasion. The Court found no evidence of collusion with the statutory body, dismissing any legal concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:13:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 655 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181806</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s ruling that buyback of lease equipment and leasing to boards were genuine transactions, not aimed at tax evasion. The Court found no evidence of collusion with the statutory body, dismissing any legal concerns.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>