<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1391 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181804</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to delete the disallowance of interest payments, amounting to &amp;amp;8377; 10,93,754/-. The Tribunal found that the investment made by the appellant was intended to earn income, even though no interest was received during the relevant period. The Tribunal concluded that the disallowance was not justified based on this intention, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:06:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1391 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181804</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) to delete the disallowance of interest payments, amounting to &amp;amp;8377; 10,93,754/-. The Tribunal found that the investment made by the appellant was intended to earn income, even though no interest was received during the relevant period. The Tribunal concluded that the disallowance was not justified based on this intention, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>