https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181792 The Supreme Court reviewed an appeal challenging the Kerala High Court's decision on the entitlement to a concessional sales tax rate on rubber used in producing compound rubber. The High Court ruled against the appellant, citing a technical distinction issue requiring further evidence. The Supreme Court found insufficient evidence supporting the respondent's claim and set aside the High Court's judgment for reevaluation. Additionally, writ petitions contesting the validity of notifications were reinstated for reconsideration, allowing for the submission of additional evidence and expediting the process within six months. The appellant's deposited amount was to remain with the Department pending the High Court's final decision. en-us Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:36:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181792 The Supreme Court reviewed an appeal challenging the Kerala High Court's decision on the entitlement to a concessional sales tax rate on rubber used in producing compound rubber. The High Court ruled against the appellant, citing a technical distinction issue requiring further evidence. The Supreme Court found insufficient evidence supporting the respondent's claim and set aside the High Court's judgment for reevaluation. Additionally, writ petitions contesting the validity of notifications were reinstated for reconsideration, allowing for the submission of additional evidence and expediting the process within six months. The appellant's deposited amount was to remain with the Department pending the High Court's final decision. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181792