<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 906 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326792</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, and dismissed the cross-objection as infructuous. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, noting that the income from liquor shops was already assessed in the hands of the AOP and that the unexplained investment was adequately explained. The Tribunal emphasized avoiding double taxation and ensuring that the income was assessed correctly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2016 12:00:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 906 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326792</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, and dismissed the cross-objection as infructuous. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s findings, noting that the income from liquor shops was already assessed in the hands of the AOP and that the unexplained investment was adequately explained. The Tribunal emphasized avoiding double taxation and ensuring that the income was assessed correctly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>