<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 883 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326769</link>
    <description>The appeal was admitted by CESTAT MUMBAI as the penalty amount was below the threshold for refusal of admission. Shri Anthony Irineus Carneiro represented the appellant, and the appeal was admitted for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 883 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326769</link>
      <description>The appeal was admitted by CESTAT MUMBAI as the penalty amount was below the threshold for refusal of admission. Shri Anthony Irineus Carneiro represented the appellant, and the appeal was admitted for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>