https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326762 Proceedings for oppression and mismanagement under sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act were treated as involving statutory reliefs, public forum jurisdiction and rights in rem, rather than a private contractual dispute. Because the petition raised substantive allegations of oppression, mismanagement, share transfers, denial of information and breach of articles, the matter could not be split into arbitrable and non-arbitrable parts or referred to arbitration under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute was therefore held to be non-arbitrable, and the section 8 application was rejected. en-us Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Jan 2025 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326762 Proceedings for oppression and mismanagement under sections 397, 398, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act were treated as involving statutory reliefs, public forum jurisdiction and rights in rem, rather than a private contractual dispute. Because the petition raised substantive allegations of oppression, mismanagement, share transfers, denial of information and breach of articles, the matter could not be split into arbitrable and non-arbitrable parts or referred to arbitration under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The dispute was therefore held to be non-arbitrable, and the section 8 application was rejected. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326762