<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>IS DRI has power to issue the SCN in DBK case</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110235</link>
    <description>The core issue is whether DRI officers can issue show-cause notices to recover erroneously granted drawback under Rule 16 of the Drawback Rules, given a 2011 amendment to section 28 and CBEC guidance; because Rule 16 was not similarly amended, administrative circulars do not alone transfer proper-officer jurisdiction to DRI, and tribunal authority has treated Rule 16&#039;s allocation as controlling for SCN issuance in drawback recoveries.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2016 12:08:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:56:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>IS DRI has power to issue the SCN in DBK case</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110235</link>
      <description>The core issue is whether DRI officers can issue show-cause notices to recover erroneously granted drawback under Rule 16 of the Drawback Rules, given a 2011 amendment to section 28 and CBEC guidance; because Rule 16 was not similarly amended, administrative circulars do not alone transfer proper-officer jurisdiction to DRI, and tribunal authority has treated Rule 16&#039;s allocation as controlling for SCN issuance in drawback recoveries.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2016 12:08:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=110235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>