<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 923 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181773</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, restoring some credits for further examination under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The addition of credits totaling Rs. 3,00,000 and Rs. 1,00,000 was deleted based on evidence presented, with two credits sent back for reconsideration by the AO. Additionally, the treatment of agricultural income was adjusted, with a revised net agricultural income of Rs. 2,90,100 established, and the remaining difference treated as income from other sources.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 17:56:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 923 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181773</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, restoring some credits for further examination under section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The addition of credits totaling Rs. 3,00,000 and Rs. 1,00,000 was deleted based on evidence presented, with two credits sent back for reconsideration by the AO. Additionally, the treatment of agricultural income was adjusted, with a revised net agricultural income of Rs. 2,90,100 established, and the remaining difference treated as income from other sources.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>