<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 853 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181771</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/- under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the deletion was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals). The Tribunal found that the loans in question were transacted through account payee cheques, and there was insufficient evidence to prove the loans were non-genuine, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2023 16:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=425006" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 853 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181771</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the deletion of the addition of Rs. 10,00,000/- under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the deletion was dismissed, affirming the decision of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals). The Tribunal found that the loans in question were transacted through account payee cheques, and there was insufficient evidence to prove the loans were non-genuine, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>