https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181765 Prior notice under Section 4-I of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1956 was mandatory before altering the definition of "Crushing Season" because the change directly affected workmen's conditions of service and wages. The Third Schedule covers wages, including the period and mode of payment, and a shortening of the seasonal engagement period necessarily reduced the time for which employees were engaged and paid. The High Court's contrary view was not sustainable. The impugned change and the consequential termination order could not stand without the prescribed notice, and the issue was decided in favour of the appellant. en-us Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Apr 2016 16:55:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181765 Prior notice under Section 4-I of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1956 was mandatory before altering the definition of "Crushing Season" because the change directly affected workmen's conditions of service and wages. The Third Schedule covers wages, including the period and mode of payment, and a shortening of the seasonal engagement period necessarily reduced the time for which employees were engaged and paid. The High Court's contrary view was not sustainable. The impugned change and the consequential termination order could not stand without the prescribed notice, and the issue was decided in favour of the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181765