<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 999 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181754</link>
    <description>In the case, for Assessment Year 2001-02, the appeal was dismissed as the advance received by the assessee was treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. However, for Assessment Years 2002-03 to 2007-08, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by reversing the applicability of Section 2(22)(e) and allowing the bad debts written off. The levy of interest under Section 234B was upheld for all years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:37:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 999 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181754</link>
      <description>In the case, for Assessment Year 2001-02, the appeal was dismissed as the advance received by the assessee was treated as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. However, for Assessment Years 2002-03 to 2007-08, the Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by reversing the applicability of Section 2(22)(e) and allowing the bad debts written off. The levy of interest under Section 234B was upheld for all years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>