<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 855 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326741</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to the addition made under Section 50C without any incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal emphasized that assessments under Section 153A must be based on seized material, following the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble High Court. Consequently, other grounds on merits became academic, and the reassessment order was deemed unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:54:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 855 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326741</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, quashing the reassessment proceedings due to the addition made under Section 50C without any incriminating material found during the search. The Tribunal emphasized that assessments under Section 153A must be based on seized material, following the precedent set by the Hon&#039;ble High Court. Consequently, other grounds on merits became academic, and the reassessment order was deemed unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>