<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 851 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326737</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The decision emphasized the importance of providing credible evidence in tax matters to substantiate claims and avoid penalties for concealing income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:54:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 851 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326737</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, reinstating the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The decision emphasized the importance of providing credible evidence in tax matters to substantiate claims and avoid penalties for concealing income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>