<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 849 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326735</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the AO to delete the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act due to non-compliance with mandatory conditions. Additionally, the ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order rejecting the deduction under section 80IA, instructing a fresh examination by the AO regarding the nature of the MOU for infrastructure development projects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:54:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 849 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326735</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the AO to delete the disallowance under section 14A of the Income Tax Act due to non-compliance with mandatory conditions. Additionally, the ITAT set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order rejecting the deduction under section 80IA, instructing a fresh examination by the AO regarding the nature of the MOU for infrastructure development projects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>