<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 848 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326734</link>
    <description>For wealth-tax valuation, an inflated report obtained for bank finance may be rejected where it does not reflect fair market value, and the assessee&#039;s valuation may be accepted when it is broadly supported by the Government ready reckoner and the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s estimate. Agricultural land that remains under cultivation and has no non-agricultural permission continues to retain its agricultural character and falls outside the definition of taxable assets; the retrospective amendment to the relevant definition also supported exclusion. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed on both issues, and the additions were not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:53:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=424926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 848 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326734</link>
      <description>For wealth-tax valuation, an inflated report obtained for bank finance may be rejected where it does not reflect fair market value, and the assessee&#039;s valuation may be accepted when it is broadly supported by the Government ready reckoner and the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s estimate. Agricultural land that remains under cultivation and has no non-agricultural permission continues to retain its agricultural character and falls outside the definition of taxable assets; the retrospective amendment to the relevant definition also supported exclusion. The Revenue&#039;s challenge therefore failed on both issues, and the additions were not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>