https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326733 The Court dismissed the Writ Petitions challenging the summons issued under the Central Excise Act and Finance Act. The petitioners, Directors of a Company, claimed the summons were vague, but the Court found their voluntary statements admitting non-payment of Service Tax as valid grounds for the summons. The Court emphasized the petitioners' opportunity to contest the matter earlier and rejected their argument of vagueness. The judgment cited by petitioners was deemed irrelevant. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent, emphasizing the petitioners' admission of non-payment and obligation to settle the outstanding liability. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326733 The Court dismissed the Writ Petitions challenging the summons issued under the Central Excise Act and Finance Act. The petitioners, Directors of a Company, claimed the summons were vague, but the Court found their voluntary statements admitting non-payment of Service Tax as valid grounds for the summons. The Court emphasized the petitioners' opportunity to contest the matter earlier and rejected their argument of vagueness. The judgment cited by petitioners was deemed irrelevant. The Court ruled in favor of the respondent, emphasizing the petitioners' admission of non-payment and obligation to settle the outstanding liability. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326733