https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326732 A writ challenge to an order under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme was held not maintainable because the petitioner had been given multiple personal hearings, had filed a reply, and the order reflected consideration of the objections raised, so no violation of natural justice was found. The Court also noted that the order was appealable and that writ jurisdiction should not be invoked without first exhausting the alternative appellate remedy. On that basis, the writ petition was rejected. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:53:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326732 A writ challenge to an order under the Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme was held not maintainable because the petitioner had been given multiple personal hearings, had filed a reply, and the order reflected consideration of the objections raised, so no violation of natural justice was found. The Court also noted that the order was appealable and that writ jurisdiction should not be invoked without first exhausting the alternative appellate remedy. On that basis, the writ petition was rejected. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 20 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326732