https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326725 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned judgment and directing the respondents to grant the refund/rebate to the petitioner with statutory interest. It emphasized that the limitation period for rebate claims should start from the date the necessary documents are provided by the department, ensuring procedural requirements do not hinder justice. The respondents were given two months to comply with the court's directive. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 May 2016 10:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326725 The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned judgment and directing the respondents to grant the refund/rebate to the petitioner with statutory interest. It emphasized that the limitation period for rebate claims should start from the date the necessary documents are provided by the department, ensuring procedural requirements do not hinder justice. The respondents were given two months to comply with the court's directive. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326725