https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326724 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order regarding clandestine removal of Polyester Texturised Yarn. The Court emphasized the insufficiency of relying solely on the statement of the authorized officer without independent verification. The matter was remitted back to the tribunal for the Revenue to submit a technical report and additional evidence, with instructions not to insist on pre-deposit of dues for the appeal hearing. The appeals were allowed, and the case was remitted for further examination without costs awarded. en-us Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 May 2016 16:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326724 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court's order regarding clandestine removal of Polyester Texturised Yarn. The Court emphasized the insufficiency of relying solely on the statement of the authorized officer without independent verification. The matter was remitted back to the tribunal for the Revenue to submit a technical report and additional evidence, with instructions not to insist on pre-deposit of dues for the appeal hearing. The appeals were allowed, and the case was remitted for further examination without costs awarded. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 27 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326724