https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326723 The High Court set aside the impugned judgment and directed the CESTAT to consider the restoration application, contingent upon the first respondent remitting the balance amount due within a specified time frame as per previous court orders. Emphasizing compliance with prior orders, the Court linked further proceedings on the enforcement of Ext.P9 notice to the deposit of specified amounts, deferring Ext.P9 enforcement pending CESTAT's decision on the restoration application or appeal restoration. The judgment clarified legal requirements for appeal restoration and Ext.P9 notice enforcement, stressing timely compliance with court orders for pursuing available legal remedies. en-us Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Oct 2016 18:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326723 The High Court set aside the impugned judgment and directed the CESTAT to consider the restoration application, contingent upon the first respondent remitting the balance amount due within a specified time frame as per previous court orders. Emphasizing compliance with prior orders, the Court linked further proceedings on the enforcement of Ext.P9 notice to the deposit of specified amounts, deferring Ext.P9 enforcement pending CESTAT's decision on the restoration application or appeal restoration. The judgment clarified legal requirements for appeal restoration and Ext.P9 notice enforcement, stressing timely compliance with court orders for pursuing available legal remedies. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=326723