https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181741 Disciplinary penalty under Rule 9 of the CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972 was sustained because the Tribunal found the finding of negligence and lack of devotion to duty was supported by evidence and was not perverse; judicial review remains limited to breach of natural justice or perversity. The claim for interest on retirement dues was partly accepted because gratuity and leave encashment became payable on superannuation and delay justified interest. Interest was declined on commutation of pension, as it is computed on the basis of the final order. en-us Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:50:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181741 Disciplinary penalty under Rule 9 of the CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972 was sustained because the Tribunal found the finding of negligence and lack of devotion to duty was supported by evidence and was not perverse; judicial review remains limited to breach of natural justice or perversity. The claim for interest on retirement dues was partly accepted because gratuity and leave encashment became payable on superannuation and delay justified interest. Interest was declined on commutation of pension, as it is computed on the basis of the final order. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 13 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181741